Legitimate crisis Governance

GOAL

Identification of the trade-offs between democratic legitimacy and crisis governance and their public perception.

question

How has multilevel governance shaped citizens’ perceptions of the political legitimacy of crisis governance?

DESCRIPTION

Governments faced a series of fundamental trade-offs between democratic legitimacy and effectiveness during the crisis governance. WP2 studies the impact of multilevel governance on the legitimacy of crisis governance in the Covid-19 pandemic. To this end, WP2 systematically reviews existing evidence of multilevel governance influences in scientific literature thus far, develops a conceptual framework for legitimate crisis governance, and examines citizens’ perception of the legitimacy of the crisis measures. The aim of this work package is to formulate good practices on the interaction between different dimensions of democracy and crisis governance.

Outputs

np_arrow_2039373_000000

Working papers

np_arrow_2039373_000000

Policy briefs

Coming soon

np_arrow_2039373_000000

Books & chapters

Coming soon

np_arrow_2039373_000000

Journal articles

Contacts for this WP

The Institute of Public Administration, University of Leiden, the Netherlands, is responsible for this
WP.

np_arrow_2039373_000000

Contact person

Kutsal Yesilkagit

np_arrow_2039373_000000

Leader

Netherlands

np_arrow_2039373_000000

Institutions involved

UiB

FUB