Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Legitimate crisis Governance

GOAL

Identification of the trade-offs between democratic legitimacy and crisis governance and their public perception.

question

How has multilevel governance shaped citizens’ perceptions of the political legitimacy of crisis governance?

DESCRIPTION

Governments faced a series of fundamental trade-offs between democratic legitimacy and effectiveness during the crisis governance. WP2 studies the impact of multilevel governance on the legitimacy of crisis governance in the Covid-19 pandemic. To this end, WP2 systematically reviews existing evidence of multilevel governance influences in scientific literature thus far, develops a conceptual framework for legitimate crisis governance, and examines citizens’ perception of the legitimacy of the crisis measures. The aim of this work package is to formulate good practices on the interaction between different dimensions of democracy and crisis governance.

Outputs

np_arrow_2039373_000000

Working papers

np_arrow_2039373_000000

Policy briefs

Coming soon

np_arrow_2039373_000000

Books & chapters

Coming soon

np_arrow_2039373_000000

Journal articles

Contacts for this WP

The Institute of Public Administration, University of Leiden, the Netherlands, is responsible for this
WP.

np_arrow_2039373_000000

Contact person

Kutsal Yesilkagit

np_arrow_2039373_000000

Leader

Netherlands

np_arrow_2039373_000000

Institutions involved

UiB

FUB