Working Papers
In this section, you can find working papers. Working papers present literature reviews on a topic or the methodological approach of a work package.
Summary
Click any link below to access the item
The second deliverable of work package 3 outlines the research design of five empirical studies that investigate the rule of law and democratic participation in the context of multilevel governance. Each of the five studies focuses on a crucial aspect of a legitimate crisis governance. These are the following aspects: 1) the declaration of a state of emergency; 2) parliamentary oversight; 3) judicial oversight; 4) the limitation of electoral participation; and 5) the role and nature of expert advice bodies.
Deliverable 4.2 presents the research outline and design that will be used to execute qualitative field research within WP 4 to detect perceptions and attitudes of respondents regarding the impacts and consequences of Covid-19 related crisis management on human rights, rights, protection and situation of diverse minorities and other distinct communities as well as on (the realization of) the principle of non-discrimination.
The deliverable based on the survey aims to study the determinants of political trust in a context of crisis governance by looking at the level of government, the type of crisis governance and the mode of interaction between government levels. We want to study the following question: how do the level of government, the type of measure and the mode of interaction between government levels affect citizens’ trust in that government to take a particular measure?
Considering that different tiers of government, including national, subnational and supranational levels, played an essential part in supporting individuals and businesses, we are interested in understanding how multilevel systems shaped the legitimacy of crisis management in terms of governance and results. For this purpose, this working paper introduces the research design that allows us to examine the impact of political de/centralisation and intergovernmental coordination on the design, implementation and results of social and economic responses to COVID-19 across different levels.
Crises, such as natural disasters, terrorist acts, economic breakdowns, or disease outbreaks, pose fundamental challenges to governments. The WP2 literature review shows that while current scholarship reveals much about national, subnational and local responses, it remains limited by a narrow set of research methods, comparisons across cases that are solely of one or another MLG-type, and a lack of specificity regarding the government response studied. The paper proposes a mixed methods research design for testing the framework to better understand the effects of multilevel governance systems on crisis governance responses and citizens’ perceptions of their legitimacy.
The Covid-19 pandemic was a stress test to democracies. To date, however, questions related to the political legitimacy and democratic quality of crisis governance have received little attention in research. To identify indicators of a democratic crisis governance, this working paper has thus reviewed the literature on Covid-19 crisis governance. It also presents an overview of the various cross-national trackers of Covid-19 measures that have been collected. As such, the paper provides the conceptual foundations for the analysis of the relationship between multi-level governance and political legitimacy in crisis governance.
The WP4 literature review shows that human rights, their limitations and suspension as well as the impacts of crisis governance on (social) minorities, marginalized groups and border communities are often mentioned during a crisis, but seldom focused on . It also shows that human rights, including rights of minorities, are among the first victims of crisis situations and crisis management.
The WP5 literature review studies the effect of multilevel governance systems and/or crisis governance on political trust. The goal of this research is to systematize and integrate knowledge of these distinct strands of research, searching for overlaps, in order to get more insight in the phenomenon of political trust.
We could draw some lessons from the existing literature and first evaluations. Besides fast interventions and established risk management frameworks, clear responsibilities and mandates as well as strong internal communication and cooperation mechanisms among agencies and governments have been crucial not only for the adoption of effective public health measures but also for the making and implementation of social, economic and fiscal measures. However, this review has also revealed the need to improve our knowledge of the impact of multilevel governance on the making and implementation of social, economic and fiscal measures.
Purpose of the data collection/generation in the LEGITIMULT project is to identify and evaluate the legal measures taken by 31 European governments, in relation to their impact on multilevel governance. This will be done through the creation of datasets highlighting how these procedures link to multiple orders of governance – WHO and EU above the states, and regional and local governments below the national level.
This dissemination strategy aims to provide the tools to build, adapt, diffuse
and participate in the implementation and use of this toolkit. It follows the structure of a funnel, starting from overall objectives to more precise actions. It also delivers indications for the strategy’s further development and updates.
If you have any feedback or questions about our publications, please contact the Institute of Federalism
